pantslessprogressive:

Newt goes on the offensive after CNN’s John King brings up the “open marriage” controversyAfter John King opened the debate with the mention of his ex-wife’s upcoming interview, King asked Gingrich, “Would you like to take some time to respond to that?”. Newt: “No, but I will.”

Gingrich called the “elite media” destructive, calling CNN’s decision to bring up the controversy “trash.” He added, ”I’m appalled you would begin a presidential debate like that.” Based on the audience’s roaring applause throughout Gingrich’s criticism of CNN and the mainstream media, I’m guessing they couldn’t agree more.

I believe that the personal lives of candidates are irrelevant unless they are doing something illegal. And the controversy about Gingrich and his ex-wife is still only alleged. So whether or not he wanted an open marriage with his ex-wife is not what gets under my skin. 

What gets me is that it seems that in the minds of his supporters who give him a standing ovation, these claims aren’t even alleged. They are just lies to get past. And not because they don’t believe that the personal lives of candidates are off limits but because they simply want a new president. So this gives Gingrich, as well as themselves, a blank check for hypocrisy for their belief in the sanctity of marriage. They will throw that under the bus and probably compromise on any other standards just so that they can get a new president. 

Hate filled passion is strange like that, I guess.

47 notes

  1. nonyap reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    I have to admit it….I agree with Gingrich...this. The same media who defended Bill...
  2. rbrayana123 reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  3. inquisitionsandanomalies reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  4. plaser reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    personal lives of candidates are irrelevant unless they are doing something illegal. And
  5. tsparks said: I agree with Newt on this one.
  6. suffusedwithlove reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  7. the-cogitator reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    the 1990’s. There was this guy in office…Mill Flinton? Gil Kingston? Oh right! Bill Clinton. He got
  8. poohistheish reblogged this from michaelzhu and added:
    ಠ_ಠ LOOK ಠ_ಠ OF ಠ_ಠ DISAPPROVAL ಠ_ಠ
  9. skinofsunset said: So much for “values”. Those queers should never be treated like human beings or given equality. *Biggest serial adulterer on stage tells them CNN is an elitist media outlet* “OH YEA!!! You tell’em Newt!”
  10. michaelzhu reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    Presidents also need...have certain qualities...honesty,...
  11. rexcerebri reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  12. socialistictendencies reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    Because a person’s character has no bearing...how they would handle high political office...
  13. nefariousnewt reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    peace, but the fact is, when...tout yourself as a superior moral arbiter for this country,...
  14. speakers-corner reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    barf. 2.) Callista is in my freaking nightmares. Look in her eyes. Seriously. There’s something missing. It’s Stepford...
  15. This was featured in #Politics
  16. thirteen-glass-houses reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  17. staygoldenponyboy-staygolden reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  18. antelopebaby reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  19. zawmer said: These are probably the same people that dragged our nation into impeachment over the Clinton affair.
  20. viciousbrandobruhl reblogged this from randomactsofchaos
  21. mar-see-ah said: you have pictures, but I TOTALLY blogged this first. (love you!)
  22. everfallinlove reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
    are trash Newt…
  23. randomactsofchaos reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  24. pantslessprogressive posted this